Over the past year at Yaqeen, we have become more deliberate in how we engage with digital tools. That commitment led us to begin auditing the platforms we rely on for complicity in the genocide in Gaza. We have already transitioned away from two platforms and continue reassessing every partnership through the same ethical lens.
The following sections outline the key issues we are actively considering.
Data privacy
In a time when personal data is often treated as a commodity, we see it as an amana (trust). Our sole purpose for collecting analytics is to serve you better—to understand how to deliver the right content to the right person at the right moment.
We believe that privacy is your right and are transparent about how we use the information provided through our website and mobile platforms,
following established privacy standards. You can modify or erase your data at any time and we never sell your data to third parties. For personalization, all data is anonymized within our systems, and the information is used solely to improve experience and accessibility.
Islamic noncompliance and AI slop
AI can make work faster, but it can also make it careless. The same tools that help generate ideas and information can just as easily produce content that sounds convincing but is fabricated, inaccurate, or misleading. These systems learn from massive datasets built largely from the internet, reflecting the cultural assumptions and biases of those who created them. Because most of that data is Western and secular in origin, AI often carries blind spots about Islam and Muslims. Some models, for instance, have even failed to acknowledge real-world injustices, such as the persecution of Uyghur Muslims.
AI’s polished tone can give the false impression of neutrality and authority, making its errors easy to trust. When applied to Islamic content, these flaws become far more serious. A model can misquote a hadith or strip a ruling of its context while sounding eloquent and confident. The harm here is not just academic; it touches faith and public understanding of Islam itself.
At Yaqeen, the responsibility for truth always lies with people. AI can support our teams by speeding up work, but it does not make decisions or carry moral weight. Like a doctor using technology to diagnose patients more accurately or reach more people, the technology may assist, but the responsibility still lies with the doctor. Our team is responsible for verifying and assessing any AI-generated content before using it in any capacity.
That accountability is reinforced through the Ihsan Assurance team, a group of Yaqeen scholars who examine every piece of content before publication. They ensure that each publication meets our standards of citation accuracy and scholarly rigor, aligns with Islamic principles, and reflects Yaqeen’s distinctive mission.
Authorship attribution
AI can produce content that looks and sounds like it was written by a person, making it harder to tell who is really behind the words. In Islamic scholarship, this matters deeply. Authorship is not just about producing material; it reflects intention and accountability before Allah. Passing off machine-generated work as human erodes trust and blurs responsibility for the content being taught or shared.
At Yaqeen, every author takes full ownership of their work. AI may assist with tasks such as research support or editorial refinement, but the content and conclusions always come from the individual scholar or writer. This responsibility is positively affirmed by the author during the submission process. In multimedia production, the same standard applies. Yaqeen does not use AI to create realistic depictions of living people or imitate their voices (i.e., deepfakes). When AI-generated visuals are used, they are limited to artistic or contextual applications, such as background footage, where the use is clear and transparent.
Copyright issues
AI models are trained on vast amounts of copyrighted material without the explicit permission, credit, or compensation of the original human creators, whose livelihoods and intellectual property rights can then be undermined by the very systems their work made possible. Islamic ethics place a high value on fairness and the protection of property.
We acknowledge that this raises important questions and creates a tension that cannot be fully resolved by our own practices alone, as true resolution requires systemic change in how AI companies operate. We are proceeding according to a conservative standard among peer practitioners in the field, and we will continue to review and refine our practices as guidance on these matters evolve. While legal debates about AI and copyright are still unfolding, our approach remains rooted in restraint. Our use of AI is limited to design and creative assistance, not as a source of content taken from others. In the emerging area of AI as a tool for Islamic research, we restrict our use to open-source datasets, such as Al-Maktaba al-Shamela and OpenITI, and not the private work of any individual, while requiring authors to cite all sources clearly.
Devaluation of human scholarship and spiritual disconnection
As AI grows more capable, there is a legitimate fear that it could weaken the depth, reflection, and intellectual rigor that defines authentic Islamic scholarship. In the Islamic tradition, knowledge has never been an exercise in processing information; it is a moral and spiritual pursuit rooted in sincerity and realized through meaningful application. Knowledge should draw us closer to Allah.
AI can process large amounts of information, but it cannot sense intention or emotion. It cannot understand personal context or grasp how a word of truth may guide one heart differently from another. When two men separately asked ʿAbdullah ibn ʿAbbas whether someone who killed a believer could be forgiven, he gave two different answers. To the man he suspected was planning a murder, he said no, hoping to deter him. To the man who had already killed and sought forgiveness, he said yes, to encourage repentance.
Imagine outsourcing this to a machine—such nuance and intuition would be lost entirely.
At Yaqeen, we have clear boundaries. Our audience-facing AI helps people interact with our existing research and content, but it does not issue rulings or provide personal religious advice. It is not an AI mufti.
Our scholars and editors remain fully responsible for every publication. The editorial team upholds standards of rigor in every publication we release. AI is treated as a tool that supports research, writing, and design, but it never substitutes scholarly thought or human insight that comes from years of study and reflection.
Internally, Yaqeen invests in its people. Tarbiya sessions and mentorship promote the growth of scholars in both skill and spirituality. This foundation protects against overreliance on technology by strengthening the very thing AI can never replicate, the human heart.
Environmental stewardship
Among all the ethical challenges tied to artificial intelligence, its environmental cost may be the hardest to address. Every digital interaction depends on physical infrastructure that consumes energy and water. While data centers have powered the internet for decades, the growth of AI has increased their presence and multiplied the demand for electricity and cooling resources. These costs are largely invisible to the user but tangible for the planet and for the communities that host these facilities. As khulafaʾ (vicegerents) on earth, humans are entrusted to preserve harmony within creation: to use its resources sustainably and justly, never to hoard or destroy what Allah has provided.
At the same time, complete abstinence from these systems is not realistic for any online institution. The same data centers that power AI also deliver every platform and video that helps Yaqeen reach audiences around the world. Withdrawing entirely would mean we are unable to access the very spaces people engage in today. AI is also not a single technology, but rather a broad spectrum of systems with largely different impacts. The tool that filters spam or recommends a video operates on a small scale, while training a large model like GPT-5 demands vast energy and resources. Treating all AIs as equal energy consumers obscures these differences. Islamic ethics call for discernment, evaluating each use by its necessity, benefit, and potential harm. Our task, therefore, is not to reject technology but to engage it responsibly, adopting what is necessary and beneficial while remaining conscious of its costs and guided by Islamic principles of balance and stewardship.
For Yaqeen, this means engaging with generative AI only where it serves a clear and beneficial purpose. Our direct environmental footprint is small, yet our potential for positive influence, through education and scholarship, is far greater. We aim to advance Islamic awareness on environmental stewardship, building on our earlier research.
This will also include upcoming work to develop
fiqh-based guidance and practical steps for responsible technology use. As always, we are committed to continued betterment, adapting and advancing our approach in light of emerging Islamic scholarship.