fbpixel

Fuel the research. Fund the reach.

Yaqeen Institute Logo

Blog

Politics & Practical Theology

Social Justice

We Won’t Back Down: When Righteous Anger Becomes a Moral Duty

The greatest fear of an oppressor is not merely weapons or political pressure; their greatest fear is an awakened, righteous anger.

Authored by

Published: September 23, 2025Rabi al-Thani 1, 1447

Updated: September 24, 2025Rabi al-Thani 2, 1447

Read time: 6 min

We Won’t Back Down: When Righteous Anger Becomes a Moral Duty
On this page
There are images that should never fade from our memory. Images that demand moral reckoning and spiritual resilience. The sight of Palestinian mothers and fathers holding the bodies of their children wounded, slain, or starving to death. The brutal bombing of medics and hospitals. The deliberate withholding of food and aid. Children executed in cold blood. An entire people forced to endure day after day of systematic humiliation.
These are not accidents of war. They are part of a deliberate strategy to secure and normalize settler colonialism, to sustain the occupation of lands not rightfully held, and to enforce a ruthless structure of apartheid that mocks every human conscience.
In these times, anger is not a flaw—it is an essential virtue.

The fear of anger

The greatest fear of an oppressor is not merely weapons or political pressure, but on a more foundational level, their greatest fear is an awakened, righteous anger. One that cannot be easily pacified or neutralized. The goal of sustained oppression is not only to dominate, but to exhaust. To numb the soul. To erode resolve. To make people indifferent to the very abuses that once stirred outrage.
But we cannot let that happen.
Imam Ibn Taymiyya captured this insight with striking clarity. He wrote,

People are not restrained from oppression except by the repelling force of anger; through that, justice and equity are upheld.1

This concept of quwwa ghadabiyya dafʿiyya—the repelling force of righteous anger—is a necessary moral force that protects justice and deters tyranny. Without it, oppression goes unchallenged, and justice remains a theoretical ideal rather than a lived reality. Without it, tyrants reign unopposed.

More like this

Exploring Islamophobia: A Snapshot of Current Research | Blog

Exploring Islamophobia: A Snapshot of Current Research | Blog

“Blood Soaked Keys to Jerusalem”: Why We Must Stand With The People of Syria | Blog

“Blood Soaked Keys to Jerusalem”: Why We Must Stand With The People of Syria | Blog

Does History Only Repeat Itself? Remembering the Rohingya in Light of Palestine | Blog

Does History Only Repeat Itself? Remembering the Rohingya in Light of Palestine | Blog

Reconciling with the Prophetic ethic

Understandably, some may ask: did not the Prophet ﷺ advise against anger? A well-known narration recounts a man who came seeking the Prophet’s advice. The Prophet ﷺ replied, “Do not become angry.” When the man repeated his request, the Prophet continued to give the same reply: “Do not become angry.”
At first glance, this might seem contradictory to any call for sustained anger. But the Prophet ﷺ did not prohibit anger in its entirety. Rather, he ﷺ warned against the kind of anger that dominates and conquers one’s character. The impulsive, self-serving anger that clouds judgment, leads to injustice, or transforms into despair.
In another narration, the Prophet ﷺ clarified, “The strong one is not the one who overcomes others in wrestling, but the one who controls himself when angry.”
The emphasis, then, is not on eradicating anger but on mastering it. The Qur’an itself describes Allah’s anger toward injustice and transgression, and the Prophet ﷺ displayed righteous anger when the sanctities of Allah were violated. Anger, in its correct form, is not only natural—it is noble.
It is purposeful anger, disciplined anger, an anger that aligns itself with the universal laws of God and is conscious and considerate of the equations of power in the world.

Resisting injustice with integrity

Righteous anger is not wild or erratic. It is measured and principled, able to resist humiliation and the normalization of evil. It opposes degradation without becoming degrading. It defies cruelty without becoming cruel. It refuses to normalize oppression or grow numb to its persistence.
This form of anger is strategic. It does not rush blindly into confrontation, but neither does it accept perpetual retreat. It understands timing. It preserves its strength. It sustains hope over the long term. And, ultimately, it knows that resistance takes many forms. Sometimes, that resistance must be overt and defiant, and premature confrontations may be forced upon parts of the ummah in certain circumstances and places. Other times, we must prepare. Our anger may be perceived as quiet but it is deliberate—learning, organizing, educating. For a student, that might mean excelling in their studies as a foundation for future leadership. For a parent, it may mean raising children who will never accept such evil and humiliation as normal.
All of this is part of a long, patient struggle for dignity and justice. 
We want an anger that builds a resistance resilient enough to weather the years, patient enough to wait for its moment, and wise enough to ensure that when it rises, it prevails, and it does not rise as another oppressor. And so, perhaps the greatest danger is not anger itself, but anger that becomes distorted. 
We are reminded by the wisdom of Imam al-Shafiʿi, who said, “Whoever is provoked to anger and does not become angry is a donkey; and whoever is sought for reconciliation and refuses it is a devil.” 
To feel no anger in the face of oppression is to surrender one’s humanity. But at the same time, to refuse reconciliation when justice has been served is to descend into cruelty. There is a balance to be struck—between principled resistance and the preservation of one’s own moral integrity.
Forgiveness, too, must be rightly placed. To forgive an active oppressor who continues to harm with impunity is not virtue—it is the acceptance of evil and the surrender of dignity masquerading as piety. 

A final reflection

In these trying times, it is not enough to feel outrage. We cannot let our fitra—our God-given compass—be dulled by the endless scroll of headlines. Outrage must be channeled into something enduring. Something that leads not only to defiance but to revival. We need anger that is rooted in our faith, guided by our ethics, and directed toward a world where dignity is not a privilege, but a right for all.
We cannot let our efforts for Palestine fade or our souls exhaust to the point of inaction. We must manifest the oppressors’ greatest fear and nurture a righteous anger that is a force for good—a path toward dignity, justice, and triumph in this life, and salvation in the next.

References

1.
Ibn Taymiyya, Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā, 15:435.
2.
Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, no. 6116.
3.
Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, no. 6114.
4.
For example, Allah says, “And [remember] when you said, ‘O Moses! We cannot endure the same meal [every day]. So [just] call upon your Lord on our behalf, He will bring forth for us some of what the earth produces of herbs, cucumbers, garlic, lentils, and onions.’ Moses scolded [them], ‘Do you exchange what is better for what is worse? [You can] go down to any village and you will find what you have asked for.’ They were stricken with disgrace and misery, and they invited the anger of Allah for rejecting Allah’s signs and unjustly killing the prophets. This is [a fair reward] for their disobedience and violations” (Qur’an 2:61). He also says, “They will be stricken with disgrace wherever they go, unless they are protected by a covenant with Allah or a treaty with the people. They have invited the anger of Allah and have been branded with misery for rejecting Allah’s revelations and murdering [His] prophets unjustly. This is [a fair reward] for their disobedience and violations” (Qur’an 3:112).
5.
For example, “Whenever Allah’s Messenger ﷺ was given the choice of one of two matters, he would choose the easier of the two, as long as it was not sinful to do so, but if it was sinful to do so, he would not approach it. Allah’s Messenger ﷺ never took revenge [over anybody] for his own sake, but [he did] only when Allah’s boundaries were violated, in which case he would take revenge for Allah’s sake.” Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, no. 3560.
6.
Imam al-Shafiʿi, Ḥilyat al-Awliyāʾ, Abū Nuʿaym, 9:143.

Want to appear on Yaqeen?

Dr. Hatem al-Haj

Dr. Hatem al-Haj

Guest Contributor

PhD in Comparative Fiqh from al-Jinan University, Pediatrician, Dean of the College of Islamic Studies at Mishkah University, and member of AMJA permanent Fatwa Committee.

Disclaimer: The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in these papers and articles are strictly those of the authors. Furthermore, Yaqeen does not endorse any of the personal views of the authors on any platform. Our team is diverse on all fronts, allowing for constant, enriching dialogue that helps us produce high-quality research.

Want to appear on Yaqeen?